Türkçe 
English 
GDocP stands for Good Documentation Practice. It is a fundamental quality approach in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical-device, and other regulated manufacturing sectors, ensuring that records are accurate, complete, legible, contemporaneous, traceable, and reliable. Electronic Batch Record (EBR) systems help apply GDocP principles in a digital environment and reduce many of the documentation risks associated with paper records.
Paper-based batch records often contain problems such as illegible handwriting, missing signatures, incorrect dates, unexplained corrections, blank spaces, missing pages, or records completed later. EBR systems, however, make these risks more manageable through electronic signatures, mandatory fields, timestamps, audit trails, authorization, and automated control structures. Centra Electronic Batch Record EBR solution contributes to the digitalization of production records in accordance with GDocP and data integrity expectations.
The Basic Logic Behind the Relationship Between GDocP and EBR
What is GDocP?
GDocP is a set of practices that defines how quality records should be created, completed, corrected, approved, stored, and presented when necessary. The aim is to ensure that the records can be used as reliable evidence. In a GMP environment, the approach that "if work isn't documented, it's not done" is therefore crucial.
Why is GDocP the cornerstone of the quality system?
Because quality decisions are made based on records. Even if production is done correctly, if the records are incomplete, inaccurate, or untraceable, the product quality can become untenable. Therefore, documentation is an integral part of the production process.
What is the relationship between EBR and GDocP?
EBR is one of the systems that brings GDocP principles to the digital production environment. The system records which step the operator took, when they took it, which value they entered, which approval they gave, and which change they made. Thus, documentation ceases to be merely filling out forms and becomes an active control mechanism for the production process.
Does EBR eliminate paper documentation entirely?
A properly validated EBR system can replace paper batch records. However, some businesses may implement a hybrid system during the transition period. In this case, it must be clearly defined which record is the official record and how paper and electronic records are related.
What does the attributable principle mean in GDocP?
Attributability means that each record clearly identifies who it belongs to. In paper-based systems, this is achieved through signatures and initials. In the EBR system, however, it is achieved through user accounts, electronic signatures, role-based authorization, and audit trail records. Every transaction must be associated with the relevant user.
Why is a shared user account risky?
If a shared user account is used, it is not possible to know exactly who performed a transaction. This creates a serious vulnerability in terms of data integrity. In EBR, each user must have a unique account, and critical transactions must be approved with a personal electronic signature.
How is the Legible principle ensured in digital recordings?
Legibility means that the record is readable and understandable. Paper records can be problematic due to illegible handwriting, messy corrections, or faded print. In EBR, readability is stronger because data is stored in digital format. However, field names, units, descriptions, and report formats must also be understandable.
Is readability simply about text clarity?
No. It must also be clear which product, batch, equipment, process step, and user a record is associated with. Documentation is still weak if the data is readable but the context is not understood.
Why is the contemporaneous principle important?
"Contemporaneous" means the record is kept at the time the transaction occurs or as close to its occurrence as possible. Records filled in after production is complete are unreliable. In EBR systems, timestamps are automatically generated, making it possible to clearly track when the data was entered.
How should late registration be managed?
The system may mark records entered after the expected time as exceptions. The QA team can review these records in the Review by Exception screen and request explanation or deviation assessment if necessary.
Frequently Asked Questions about GDocP
How are the Original and Accurate principles preserved in EBR?
Original means preserving the original data; Accurate means ensuring the data is correct. In EBR, device integrations, automated data retrieval, calculation checks, limit validation, and mandatory field structures support these principles. If manual corrections are required, the old value should not be deleted; the new value and the reason for the change should be saved.
How should data correction be performed?
The previous record should not be lost during the correction process. The system should store the old value, the new value, the user who made the change, the time information, and the reason within the audit trail. Unexplained data changes pose a data integrity risk.
Why are the principles of Complete and Consistent necessary?
"Complete" means the record is complete. "Consistent" means the record is logically and chronologically consistent. EBR systems support these principles with mandatory fields, step-locking, electronic signature verification, and workflow rules. For example, proceeding to the next step can be prevented until a critical step is completed.
Why does incomplete record keeping pose an audit risk?
Incomplete records make it difficult to prove that the production process was actually carried out according to procedure. Batch evaluation is particularly weak if critical process parameters, QC results, or approval signatures are missing.
How do electronic signatures and audit trails support GDocP?
An electronic signature indicates that a transaction has been approved by an authorized person. An audit trail stores the transaction history in the system. Together, these two structures help to show who created, approved, or modified the records.
Is an audit trail review necessary?
Yes. The mere existence of an audit trail is not sufficient. Critical record changes, unusual user activity, and unexplained corrections must be examined on a risk-based approach. This examination should be defined by procedure and be demonstrable to the auditor when required.
How can GDocP be preserved during the transition from paper to digital?
Existing documentation principles should not be lost when transitioning from paper to EBR. On the contrary, the digital system should implement these principles more strongly. The official record definition, user authorizations, electronic signature rules, data correction procedure, archiving, and reporting approach should be defined from the outset.
What should be considered during the hybrid phase?
In the hybrid era, a clear referencing system must be established between paper and electronic records. The paper MBR should specify which section is kept in the EBR, the electronic record should be identified as an official source, and the QA review process should be structured to encompass both sources.
How does Centra support EBR GDocP applications?
Centra EBR can support GDocP applications with features such as electronic signature, audit trail, timestamp, role-based authorization, mandatory field management, limit control, record templates, and reporting. This makes production records more readable, traceable, complete, and audit-ready.
How to get started with a GDocP-compliant EBR architecture?
Businesses should first identify documentation risks in their existing paper records. Missing signatures, late entries, unexplained corrections, unreadable areas, and missing pages should be analyzed. Then, a plan should be developed to mitigate these risks through controls within the EBR (Electronic Batch Record). To evaluate a GDocP-compliant electronic batch record structure, you can contact Centra via their information page.
