Türkçe 
English 
From an auditor’s perspective, an Electronic Batch Record (EBR) system is not merely a digital production record. It is a controlled structure in which production data, electronic signatures, audit trails, deviations, approvals, and batch-release information are managed together. Auditors therefore assess both the system’s technical capabilities and how effectively it is governed within the quality system.
For an auditor, the value of an EBR is not limited to the modern look of the screens or the digital storage of records. The real question is: Does this system ensure that the right people enter the right data at the right time, track changes, reliably manage electronic signatures, and generate reliable records to support batch release decisions? The Centra Electronic Batch Record EBR solution contributes to the digital management of traceability, record integrity, and quality control structures needed in audits.
Key Areas Examined by the Auditor in the EBR System
What is an auditor's assessment?
The auditor's assessment examines whether the EBR system operates in accordance with GMP expectations, data integrity principles, and the company's own quality procedures. During this assessment, not only the system's technical specifications but also user behavior, authorization model, validation records, and its connection to quality processes are checked.
Does the auditor only look at the software?
No. In addition to the software, the auditor also evaluates how the system is used, whether users have been trained, how changes are managed, how deviations are recorded, and how electronic records are maintained as formal proof of quality.
What does an auditor look at first in an EBR?
The auditor typically wants to understand the intended use of the system, the scope of GMP, and which records are considered official records within the EBR. In which products, operations, user groups, and approval workflows is the system used? Clear answers to these questions are necessary.
Why is the definition of official registration important?
If a business keeps some records on paper and some in an EBR, it must be clear which record is the original and official record. In a hybrid setup, if a clear reference is not established between the paper MBR and the electronic record, the auditor may see a risk to data integrity.
How is data integrity assessed?
The auditor examines how the EBR system supports ALCOA++ principles. This includes assessing data ownership, readability, timeliness, preservation of original data, accuracy, completeness, consistency, persistence, and accessibility when needed.
What data integrity risks does the auditor look for?
Shared user accounts, unexplained data changes, closed audit trails, retroactive record entry, missing electronic signatures, unauthorized access, manual calculation errors, and deletable records are critical risks to data integrity.
How to verify an electronic signature?
Electronic signatures are one of the most critical areas in EBR audits. The auditor can check whether the electronic signature is linked to the user identity, whether the purpose of the signature is clearly recorded, whether the signature includes date and time information, and whether it is stored in a way that prevents subsequent alteration.
Is an electronic signature equivalent to a paper signature?
A properly validated electronic signature, associated with a user identity and configured according to regulatory requirements, can be used as a digital equivalent to a paper signature. However, this requires the system to comply with 21 CFR Part 11, EU GMP Annex 11, and the company's internal procedures.
How to review an audit trail?
An audit trail is a traceable history of operations performed on a system. The auditor checks whether the old value, new value, user, date, time, and reason for change are recorded when data is modified. The audit trail is not merely a technical record, but fundamental proof of data integrity.
Is it sufficient if the audit trail is active but not being reviewed?
No. Having an active audit trail is not enough on its own. The company needs to review its audit trail records on a risk-based approach, evaluate critical changes, and address unusual transactions within its quality system.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding EBR Audits
How does the auditor evaluate EBR validation?
The auditor examines whether the EBR system has been validated for its intended use. Key documents in this evaluation include the URS, risk assessment, validation plan, OQ/PQ tests, traceability matrix, test deviations, validation summary report, and go-live approvals.
What are the most common shortcomings in validation?
Common shortcomings include a lack of traceability between user requirements and tests, inadequate electronic signature and audit trail testing, incomplete post-change impact analysis, and failure to test real-world use cases within the scope of PQ (Processing Quotient).
How to check a batch record review?
The auditor wants to understand how the batch record is reviewed after production is complete. Questions might include: which screens does the QA team use for review, which exceptions are highlighted, how Review by Exception works, and which records form the basis for the batch release decision.
How should the Review by Exception function be explained in the audit?
Review by Exception doesn't mean QA ignores records; it means the system prioritizes exceptions over normal records that it automatically checks. The auditor should be clearly shown which exceptions the system catches and how QA evaluates them.
How are deviation and CAPA correlation evaluated?
The connection between deviations in the EBR and the batch record is important for the auditor. It should be possible to track at which step the deviation occurred, how the deviation was classified, how the root cause analysis was performed, whether CAPA was opened, and how the effectiveness of the actions was monitored.
What happens if the deviation record is disconnected from the EBR?
If the deviation record is not associated with the relevant batch, process step, or data, the auditor may question the reliability of the root cause analysis. The link between EBR and the quality management system is therefore critical.
How are reporting and ePQR outputs reviewed?
The auditor may also inquire about how EBR data is used in reporting and ePQR processes. Batch summaries, deviation reports, electronic signature reports, audit trail reports, trend analyses, and process capability indicators provide important evidence in the audit.
What is required for reports to be reliable?
For reports to be reliable, the data source must be clear, the report logic must be validated, the filtering criteria must be explicit, and the report outputs must be immutable or stored in a controlled manner. Otherwise, the report may become weak evidence for quality judgment.
How does Centra contribute to the EBR auditor assessment?
Centra EBR can enhance the traceability needed in auditor evaluation with its electronic signature, authorization, audit trail, limit control, record templates, deviation visibility, reporting, and analysis structures. The system supports not only the digital storage of production data but also its defensibility in terms of quality and auditing.
How to begin preparing for an audit?
Businesses preparing for an EBR audit should review the system scope, official record definition, validation documents, user authorizations, electronic signature records, audit trail review procedure, and deviation links. To assess your EBR system's audit readiness, you can contact Centra via their information page.
